Design of a TAM Framework with Emotional Variables in the Acceptance of Health-based IoT in Indonesia

Dendy Jonas; Evi Maria; Sutarto; Indrastanti  Ratna Widiasari; Untung Rahardja; Theophilus Wellem

doi:10.34306/ajri.v5i2.1005

Authors

Dendy Jonas Univeristy of Raharja
Evi Maria Satya Wacana Christian University
Sutarto Satya Wacana Christian University
Indrastanti Ratna Widiasari Satya Wacana Christian University
Untung Rahardja University of Raharja
Theophilus Wellem Satya Wacana Christian University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34306/ajri.v5i2.1005

Keywords:

Healthcare-based IoT , Safe Entry Station (SES), SmartPLS Analysis, IoT Devices Acceptance, Health Screening

Abstract

Utilizing IoT based on health services cannot be avoided, especially during a pandemic requiring a screening process for a person's condition. It serves as an important tool for conducting initial health assessments, which are critical in determining subsequent healthcare interventions. Healthcare-oriented IoT solutions offer a cost-effective approach to remote health evaluation, expanding their reach to remote and underserved areas. The implementation of Safe Entry Stations (SES) further enhances this process by capturing fundamental health metrics such as blood pressure, heart rate, and respiratory rate. This article delves into the exploration of the determinants that influence individuals' intentions to adopt health-focused IoT devices. This introduces a new Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) framework by including additional variables. These findings, as revealed through SmartPLS analysis, confirm the significant impact on the acceptance and integration of health-oriented IoT devices. This research underscores the important role of IoT technology in the healthcare sector and contributes relevant insights for its widespread adoption and implementation.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

M. H. Kalayou, B. F. Endehabtu, and B. Tilahun, “The applicability of the modified technology acceptance model (TAM) on the sustainable adoption of eHealth systems in resource-limited settings,” J. Multidiscip. Healthc., pp. 1827–1837, 2020.

A. Shahi, S. Kaur, A. Mittal, and S. V. Singh, “Building Technology adoption model for the success of Women Healthcare Workers,” in 2022 5th International Conference on Contemporary Computing and Informatics (IC3I), 2022, pp. 175–180.

K. Sevcenko and I. Lindgren, “The effects of virtual reality training in stroke and Parkinson’s disease rehabilitation: a systematic review and a perspective on usability,” Eur. Rev. Aging Phys. Act., vol. 19, no. 1, p. 4, 2022.

S. A. Kamal, M. Shafiq, and P. Kakria, “Investigating acceptance of telemedicine services through an extended technology acceptance model (TAM),” Technol. Soc., vol. 60, p. 101212, 2020.

A. A. K. Niazi, T. F. Qazi, A. Basit, and K. S. Khan, “Curing expensive mistakes: applying ISM on Employees’ emotional behaviors in environment of mergers,” Rev. Econ. Dev. Stud., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 79–94, 2019.

M. Alraja, “Frontline healthcare providers’ behavioural intention to Internet of Things (IoT)-enabled healthcare applications: A gender-based, cross-generational study,” Technol. Forecast. Soc. Change, vol. 174, p. 121256, 2022.

M. H. Kashani, M. Madanipour, M. Nikravan, P. Asghari, and E. Mahdipour, “A systematic review of IoT in healthcare: Applications, techniques, and trends,” J. Netw. Comput. Appl., vol. 192, p. 103164, 2021.

C. L. Bennett and D. K. Rosner, “The promise of empathy: Design, disability, and knowing the" other",” in Proceedings of the 2019 CHI conference on human factors in computing systems, 2019, pp. 1–13.

W. P. Cheshire et al., “Patient perception of physician empathy in stroke telemedicine,” J. Telemed. Telecare, vol. 27, no. 9, pp. 572–581, 2021.

M. C. Saputra and E. Andajani, “Analysis of Factors Influencing Intention to Adopt Battery Electric Vehicle in Indonesia,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 100–109, 2024.

M. H. R. Chakim, M. Hatta, A. Himki, A. R. A. Zahra, and N. N. Azizah, “The Relationship Between Smart Cities and Smart Tourism: Using a Systematic Review,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1Sp, pp. 33–44, 2023.

A. Zia, S. Younus, and F. Mirza, “Investigating the impact of brand image and brand loyalty on brand equity: the mediating role of brand awareness,” Int. J. Innov. Creat. Chang., vol. 15, no. 2, pp. 1091–1106, 2021.

N. P. L. Santoso, R. A. Sunarjo, and I. S. Fadli, “Analyzing the Factors Influencing the Success of Business Incubation Programs: A SmartPLS Approach,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 60–71, 2023.

E. Bonfré and L. Adolfsson, “Competitiveness in Music Streaming. Investigating how the entry of big technology companies influence competitive advantages in music streaming,” 2020.

M. Moudatsou, A. Stavropoulou, A. Philalithis, and S. Koukouli, “The role of empathy in health and social care professionals,” in Healthcare, 2020, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 26.

S. Malenfant, P. Jaggi, K. A. Hayden, and S. Sinclair, “Compassion in healthcare: an updated scoping review of the literature,” BMC Palliat. Care, vol. 21, no. 1, pp. 1–28, 2022.

N. Al-Qaysi, N. Mohamad-Nordin, and M. Al-Emran, “Employing the technology acceptance model in social media: A systematic review,” Educ. Inf. Technol., vol. 25, pp. 4961–5002, 2020.

P. Grover, A. K. Kar, M. Janssen, and P. V. Ilavarasan, “Perceived usefulness, ease of use and user acceptance of blockchain technology for digital transactions–insights from user-generated content on Twitter,” Enterp. Inf. Syst., vol. 13, no. 6, pp. 771–800, 2019.

M. O. Parvez, H. Arasli, A. Ozturen, R. N. Lodhi, and V. Ongsakul, “Antecedents of human-robot collaboration: theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model,” J. Hosp. Tour. Technol., vol. 13, no. 2, pp. 240–263, 2022.

D. Tao, T. Wang, T. Wang, T. Zhang, X. Zhang, and X. Qu, “A systematic review and meta-analysis of user acceptance of consumer-oriented health information technologies,” Comput. Human Behav., vol. 104, p. 106147, 2020.

H. Cho, C. Chi, and W. Chiu, “Understanding sustained usage of health and fitness apps: Incorporating the technology acceptance model with the investment model,” Technol. Soc., vol. 63, p. 101429, 2020.

L. Philip and T. Pradiani, “Influence Brand Experience, Viral Marketing and Brand Image to Brand Loyalty to Service Users Streaming Spotify in Indonesia,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 127–135, 2024.

A. Alsyouf et al., “The use of a Technology Acceptance Model (TAM) to predict patients’ usage of a personal health record system: The role of security, privacy, and usability,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 20, no. 2, p. 1347, 2023.

A. Tahar, H. A. Riyadh, H. Sofyani, and W. E. Purnomo, “Perceived ease of use, perceived usefulness, perceived security and intention to use e-filing: The role of technology readiness,” J. Asian Financ. Econ. Bus., vol. 7, no. 9, pp. 537–547, 2020.

I. Ajzen, “From intentions to actions: A theory of planned behavior,” in Action control: From cognition to behavior, Springer, 1985, pp. 11–39.

R. KUSHWAH, R. MURADIA, and A. S. BIST, “DATA STUDY OF SAFE ENTRY STATION (SES) TO ENSURE FIT FOR DUTY,” J. Int. Res. Med. Pharm. Sci., pp. 1–5, 2022.

R. KUSHWAH, R. MURADIA, and A. S. BIST, “EVALUATION OF FATIGUE LEVEL BY SAFE ENTRY STATION USING NOVEL DEEP LEARNING TECHNIQUE,” J. Basic Appl. Res. Int., vol. 28, no. 6, pp. 66–71, 2022.

N. K. D. Sabrina, D. Pramana, and T. M. Kusuma, “Implementation of Golang and ReactJS in the COVID-19 Vaccination Reservation System,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2023.

T. Ye et al., “Psychosocial factors affecting artificial intelligence adoption in health care in China: Cross-sectional study,” J. Med. Internet Res., vol. 21, no. 10, p. e14316, 2019.

N. N. Rafiana, “Technopreneurship Strategy to Grow Entrepreneurship Career Options for Students in Higher Education,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 110–126, 2024.

D. Liu, Q. Li, and S. Han, “Using extended technology acceptance model to assess the adopt intention of a proposed IoT-based health management tool,” Sensors, vol. 22, no. 16, p. 6092, 2022.

H. Ahmadi, G. Arji, L. Shahmoradi, R. Safdari, M. Nilashi, and M. Alizadeh, “The application of internet of things in healthcare: a systematic literature review and classification,” Univers. Access Inf. Soc., vol. 18, pp. 837–869, 2019.

M. Usak, M. Kubiatko, M. S. Shabbir, O. Viktorovna Dudnik, K. Jermsittiparsert, and L. Rajabion, “Health care service delivery based on the Internet of things: A systematic and comprehensive study,” Int. J. Commun. Syst., vol. 33, no. 2, p. e4179, 2020.

F. Alshehri and G. Muhammad, “A comprehensive survey of the Internet of Things (IoT) and AI-based smart healthcare,” IEEE Access, vol. 9, pp. 3660–3678, 2020.