Publication Ethics

Publication Ethics and Publication Malpractice Statement

ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer and the publisher Pandawan Sejahtera Indonesia. This statement is based on the previous COPE’s Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors and the current COPE's Core Practices.

Ethical Guideline for Journal Publication

The publication of scholarly articles in the Journal of ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI), a peer-reviewed journal, plays a pivotal role in establishing a coherent and esteemed knowledge network. This process serves as a direct representation of the authors' work and the institutions endorsing them, contributing to the advancement of scientific understanding. Peer-reviewed articles within AJRI serve as a manifestation of the rigorous scientific method. As such, it is imperative to establish and adhere to standardized ethical principles for all stakeholders involved in the publication process: the author, the journal editor, the peer reviewer, the publisher, and the society at large.

Publisher and Editor

Pandawan Sejahtera Indonesia as publisher of Journal of ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) takes its duties of guardianship over all stages of publishing extremely seriously and we recognize our ethical and other responsibilities. We are committed to ensuring that advertising, reprint or other commercial revenue has no impact or influence on editorial decisions. In addition, the Editorial Board will assist in communications with other journals and/or publishers where this is useful and necessary.

Publication decisions

The editor in chief of ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) is responsible for deciding which of the articles submitted to the journal should be published. The decision is based on the recommendation of the journal's editorial board members and reviewers. The journal abides by legal requirements as shall then be in force regarding libel, copyright infringement and plagiarism. The editor confers with the editorial team and reviewers in making this decision.

Non-Discrimination

Editors and responsible for the person who is responsible for controlling the intellectuals of the tribe, gender, religious beliefs, ethnic origin, sexual orientation, nationality or philosophy of the author.

Confidentiality

Editors, reviewers, and the editorial team are prohibited from submitting information about anything including manuscripts to be sent to all parties other than authors, reviewers, prospective reviewers, the editorial team and publishers.

Disclosure and conflicts of interest

Unpublished material on submitted manuscripts is prohibited from being used by all members of the editorial board and reviewers in their research.

Duties of Reviewers

Contribution to Editorial Decisions

The editor in chief of ADI Journal on Recent Innovation (AJRI) is obliged to decide which articles to publish in the journal. This decision is based on references from members of the journal editorial board and reviewers. The following journals comply with applicable legal requirements regarding plagiarism and copyright infringement. Editors discuss with the editorial team and reviewers about making decisions.

Promptness

Journal editors are committed to providing timely reviews to authors. If a reviewer doesn't submit their report on time, the article will be immediately sent to another qualified reviewer.

Confidentiality

The contents of this manuscript are treated in strict confidence. This journal uses a double blind process. Except for editor-in-chief, editors and reviewers cannot discuss articles with other people, including the author.

Standards of Objectivity

Editors and reviewers are asked to evaluate articles based on their content. Review comments must respect the author. The reviewer must justify their decisions and recommendations.

Acknowledgement of Sources

The reviewer must identify relevant published works that have not been cited by the author. Any statement based on previously reported observations, derivations or arguments must be accompanied by the relevant citation. Reviewers should also call attention to editors for any similarities between the article under consideration and other articles for publication that they know individually.

Disclosure and Conflict of Interest

Information or ideas that have been obtained through peer review must be kept confidential and are not allowed for personal gain. Reviewers are prohibited from considering where a text has a conflict of interest that results from competitive, collaborative, or other connected relationships with any author, company, or institution the article is associated with.

Duties of Authors

Reporting standards

Authors are required to present an accurate report on the work as well as an objective discussion of its significance. The underlying data must be presented accurately. An article should contain sufficient detail and references to allow others to replicate it with work whenever possible. Statements that are deceptive or intentionally inaccurate are unethical behavior and should not be accepted.

Data Access and Retention

Authors were asked to provide raw data relating to the article for editorial review. They must provide the data within a reasonable time.

Originality and Plagiarism

Authors ensure that they have written the complete work and if the author is using someone else's work or words then this has been cited appropriately. Articles found with such problems are automatically rejected and the author is strongly recommended.

Multiple, Redundant or Concurrent Publication

When an article is submitted for publication, the submitting author makes a written statement that the article has not been published, not currently it is being published with another journal. Hence concurrent submission is considered unethical and therefore unacceptable.

Acknowledgment of Sources

Required for proper recognition of other people's work. Authors should cite an article publication that leads to the author's current research.

Authorship of the Paper

Authorities should be limited to those who have made a significant contribution to the research reported in the manuscript. These authors have a sense of responsibility to continue sending to co-authors with a review process. If accepted, that all authors are required to provide a signed statement that the research work is their original research work.

Disclosure and Conflicts of Interest

All authors must disclose in their manuscripts any financial or other substantive conflicts of interest that could be interpreted to influence the results or interpretation of the manuscript. All sources of financial support for the project should be identified.

Fundamental errors in published works

When an author finds significant inaccuracies in his published work, it is the author's obligation to immediately notify the journal editor or publisher and work closely with the editor to correct the article.