Developing Sustainable Technology through Ethical AI Governance Models in Business Environments

Henderi; Qurotul  Aini; Purwanti Purwanti; Rifqa Nabila Muti; Eamon  Fletcher

doi:10.34306/ajri.v6i2.1179

Authors

Henderi University of Raharja https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9354-4992
Qurotul Aini University of Raharja https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7546-5721
Purwanti Purwanti PT Super Air Jet https://orcid.org/0009-0001-5285-744X
Rifqa Nabila Muti University of Raharja https://orcid.org/0009-0008-2980-3823
Eamon Fletcher Eduaward Incorporation https://orcid.org/0009-0000-5048-2165

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34306/ajri.v6i2.1179

Keywords:

Ethical AI Governance, Innovation, Business Environments, Development, Stakeholder Engagement

Abstract

The rapid adoption of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in business offers transfor- mative opportunities but introduces ethical challenges requiring robust gover- nance models. This study investigates the development of ethical AI gover- nance frameworks to align technology adoption with societal values and sus- tainability goals. Through a mixed-methods approach, qualitative interviews with industry experts and quantitative case study analyses are conducted to ex- plore best practices and key challenges. Findings emphasize the necessity of transparency, stakeholder engagement, and regulatory compliance in fostering trust and accountability within AI-driven processes. The research concludes by proposing a comprehensive governance model that integrates ethical princi- ples with innovation, offering practical solutions for businesses to sustainably leverage AI while mitigating risks and enhancing societal benefits. This study contributes to the growing discourse on sustainable technology and responsible AI deployment in business environments.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

N. Shiri, “Attitude toward organic agribusiness: an approach to developing sustainable business,” British Food Journal, vol. 123, no. 10, pp. 3265–3276, 2021.

C. A. Ruggerio, “Sustainability and sustainable development: A review of principles and definitions,” Science of the Total Environment, vol. 786, p. 147481, 2021.

B. Peng, Y. Zhao, E. Elahi, and A. Wan, “Does the business environment improve the competitiveness of startups the moderating effect of cross-border ability and the mediating effect of entrepreneurship,” Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, vol. 29, no. 5, pp. 1173–1185, 2022.

D. Satterthwaite, “Sustainable cities or cities that contribute to sustainable development?” in The Earth scan reader in sustainable cities. Routledge, 2021, pp. 80–106.

M. Ghobakhloo, M. Iranmanesh, A. Grybauskas, M. Vilkas, and M. Petrait˙e, “Industry 4.0, innovation, and sustainable development: A systematic review and a roadmap to sustainable innovation,” Business Strategy and the Environment, vol. 30, no. 8, pp. 4237–4257, 2021.

D. Streimikiene, B. Svagzdiene, E. Jasinskas, and A. Simanavicius, “Sustainable tourism development and competitiveness: The systematic literature review,” Sustainable development, vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 259– 271, 2021.

N. Ulita, O. P. Maria, and A. Khan, “Implementasi creativepreneurship berbasis multidisiplin dalam pengabdian masyarakat untuk peningkatan kesejahteraan sosial,” ADI Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 57–64, 2024.

A. Van Wynsberghe, “Sustainable ai: Ai for sustainability and the sustainability of ai,” AI and Ethics, vol. 1, no. 3, pp. 213–218, 2021.

M. F. Ashby, Materials and sustainable development. Butterworth-Heinemann, 2022.

A. Daly, T. Hagendorff, L. Hui, M. Mann, V. Marda, B. Wagner, and W. Wei Wang, “Ai, governance and ethics: Global perspectives.” 2022.

H. Ramdhan and S. Aripin, “Strategi digital untuk bisnis: Pendekatan praktis dan implementasi di industri 4.0,” ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 34–40, 2024.

R. Eitel-Porter, “Beyond the promise: implementing ethical ai,” AI and Ethics, vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 73–80, 2021.

P. Kommisetty and N. Abhireddy, “Cloud migration strategies: Ensuring seamless integration and scala- bility in dynamic business environments,” International Journal of Engineering and Computer Science, vol. 13, no. 04, pp. 26 146–26 156, 2024.

C. B. Pocol, L. Stanca, D.-C. Dabija, I. D. Pop, and S. Mis, coiu, “Knowledge co-creation and sustain- able education in the labor market-driven university–business environment,” Frontiers in Environmental Science, vol. 10, p. 781075, 2022.

N. Ani, R. N. Muti, and L. Meria, “Strategi efektif menghadapi dinamika global: Pendekatan manajemen perubahan organisasi yang terbukti,” ADI Bisnis Digital Interdisiplin Jurnal, vol. 5, no. 2, pp. 56–63, 2024.

O. Shenkar, Y. Luo, and T. Chi, International business. Routledge, 2021.

C. A. Tavera Romero, J. H. Ortiz, O. I. Khalaf, and A. R´ıos Prado, “Business intelligence: business evolution after industry 4.0,” Sustainability, vol. 13, no. 18, p. 10026, 2021.

G. Halkos and E.-C. Gkampoura, “Where do we stand on the 17 sustainable development goals an overview on progress,” Economic Analysis and Policy, vol. 70, pp. 94–122, 2021.

P. Hendradi, “Implementation of the knowledge management (km) model in increasing student body in private universities,” ADI Journal on Recent Innovation, vol. 6, no. 1, pp. 32–43, 2024.

D. Sun, W. Gao, H. Hu, and S. Zhou, “Why 90% of clinical drug development fails and how to improve it” Acta Pharmaceutica Sinica B, vol. 12, no. 7, pp. 3049–3062, 2022.

N. Haefner, J. Wincent, V. Parida, and O. Gassmann, “Artificial intelligence and innovation management: A review, framework, and research agenda,” Technological Forecasting and Social Change, vol. 162, p. 120392, 2021.

A. N. Clements, The biology of mosquitoes, Volume 1: Development, nutrition and reproduction. Cabi GB, 2023.

B. Russell and N. Griffin, My philosophical development. Routledge, 2022.

J. Hyland and M. Karlsson, “Towards a management system standard for innovation,” Journal of Innovation Management, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. XI–XIX, 2021.

N. Anwar, J. Anderson, T. Williams et al., “Applying data science to analyze and improve student learning outcomes in educational environments,” International Transactions on Education Technology (ITEE), vol. 3, no. 1, pp. 72–83, 2024.

J. Kujala, S. Sachs, H. Leinonen, A. Heikkinen, and D. Laude, “Stakeholder engagement: Past, present, and future,” Business & Society, vol. 61, no. 5, pp. 1136–1196, 2022.

P. Ghauri, R. Strange, and F. L. Cooke, “Research on international business: The new realities,” International Business Review, vol. 30, no. 2, p. 101794, 2021.

M. H. Saad, G. Hagelaar, G. Van Der Velde, and S. Omta, “Conceptualization of smes business resilience: A systematic literature review,” Cogent Business & Management, vol. 8, no. 1, p. 1938347, 2021.

M. U. Shah and P. D. Guild, “Stakeholder engagement strategy of technology firms: A review and applied view of stakeholder theory,” Technovation, vol. 114, p. 102460, 2022.

J. R. Mitchell, R. K. Mitchell, R. A. Hunt, D. M. Townsend, and J. H. Lee, “Stakeholder engagement, knowledge problems and ethical challenges,” Journal of Business Ethics, vol. 175, pp. 75–94, 2022.

M. Oladeinde, E. C. Okeleke, O. R. Adaramodu, O. G. Fakeyede, and O. A. Farayola, “Communicating it audit findings: strategies for effective stakeholder engagement,” Computer Science & IT Research Journal, vol. 4, no. 2, pp. 126–139, 2023.

Z. Tekic and J. F¨uller, “Managing innovation in the era of ai,” Technology in Society, vol. 73, p. 102254, 2023.

M. M¨antym¨aki, M. Minkkinen, T. Birkstedt, and M. Viljanen, “Defining organizational ai governance,” AI and Ethics, vol. 2, no. 4, pp. 603–609, 2022.

A. Hund, H.-T. Wagner, D. Beimborn, and T. Weitzel, “Digital innovation: Review and novel perspective,” The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, vol. 30, no. 4, p. 101695, 2021.

J. M¨okander and L. Floridi, “Operationalising ai governance through ethics-based auditing: an industry case study,” AI and Ethics, vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 451–468, 2023.