- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Archiving
- Publication Frequency
- Publication Ethics
- Waiver Policy
- Screening for Plagiarism
- Author Fee
Focus and Scope
The purpose of the ADI Journal on Recent Innovations (ADI) is to promote the widespread dissemination of systematically conducted scientific research in the broad field of Information Systems research. ADIMAS Journal accepts articles related to community service through research that meets the established standards for publication.
The scope of the ADI Journal on Community Service (ADIMAS) includes:
1. Community Service
2. Multidisciplinary Approaches
3. Creativepreneurship
4. Community Activities
5. Social Field
6. Social Education
Peer Review Process
ADI Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (ADIMAS) publishes articles following the ADIMAS guidelines and templates. Before reviewing the manuscript, it will be sent to the editorial team to assess the suitability of the text with the focus and scope, and style of journal writing guidelines of ADIMAS. All submitted manuscripts will undergo a double-blind review process.
1. Manuscripts will be sent to at least two anonymous reviewers (Double Blind Peer-Review). The reviewers' comments are then sent to the corresponding author for the necessary actions and responses.
2. Reviewers provide an assessment of the manuscript, which includes originality, scientific contributions, and clarity of presentation.
3. ADIMAS has four types of decisions: accepted, minor revision, major revision, and rejected.
No |
ADIMAS Journal Document |
1. |
Articles accepted for processing are those that conform to the specified journal writing framework, which can be reviewed in more detail in the following LaTeX template. |
2. |
Articles accepted for processing are those that have fulfilled the journal’s checklist, which can be reviewed in more detail here. |
3. |
The article review process is divided into two stages: review by the Editor and review by the Reviewer. |
4. |
The review process by the Editor involves checking the article's writing, where only articles that adhere to the template will be approved. |
5. |
After the article review by the Editor, the article will be further processed for plagiarism scanning. Articles that pass the Editor’s review stage must have a satisfactory plagiarism scan result. |
6. |
Journals that have passed the Editor's review stage will be further reviewed by two Reviewers. |
7. |
The article will be reviewed by the Reviewers within a maximum of 14 days of the review process. |
8. |
The Reviewer’s evaluation process is entirely based on the Reviewer’s assessment. |
9. |
Revisions requested by the Reviewer must be completed within 7 days after the review results are sent. |
10. |
Revisions submitted after the specified deadline will be automatically rejected. |
11. |
Articles must be original, with a plagiarism level of less than 30%. |
Archiving
This journal utilizes the LOCKSS and CLOCKSS system to create a distributed archiving system among participating libraries and permits those libraries to create permanent archives of the journal for purposes of preservation and restoration. More...Publication Frequency
ADIMAS Journal is published twice a year, with one volume every 6 months. The publication schedule begins in May and November, followed by the next 6-month period. The journal submission opening will be at the beginning of the first month and will close at the end of the first month. The review process will take place during the second month. All accepted articles will be published at the end of the sixth month.
Publication Ethics
ADI Journal of Community Service (ADIMAS) is a peer-reviewed open-access journal. This statement clarifies the ethical behavior of all parties involved in the act of publishing an article in this journal, including the author, the chief editor, the Editorial Board, the peer-reviewer, and the publisher (Pandawan Sejahtera Indonesia).
This scientific publication ethics statement outlines the code of ethics for all parties involved in the journal publication process, namely the management, editor, peer reviewers, and authors. The core principles of the Scientific Publication Ethics Code are as follows: (i) Neutrality, meaning free from conflicts of interest in managing publications; (ii) Fairness, meaning granting authorship rights to those who are entitled as authors; and (iii) Honesty, meaning free from duplication, fabrication, falsification, and plagiarism in publications. After reading this Scientific Publication Ethics, please download the Ethics Statement and Copyright Agreement. Kindly sign and submit the Ethics Statement as part of your initial article submission. The Copyright Agreement must be submitted before the article can be published. The Ethics Statement and Copyright Agreement can be sent via mail, email, or fax.