STUDY OF WORK UNIT PRICE PERMEN PUPR NUMBER 28 OF 2016 WITH PERMEN PUPR NUMBER 1 YEAR 2022 IN JU 1 RIVER EXCAVATION WORK

Fakhri Kalbuadi; Bambang Endro Yuwono

doi:10.34306/ajri.v5i1.991

Authors

Fakhri Kalbuadi Universitas Trisakti
Bambang Endro Yuwono Universitas Trisakti

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.34306/ajri.v5i1.991

Keywords:

Implementation Method, Equipment, Analysis of the Unit Price of Work, Regulation of the Minister of PUPR, Labor

Abstract

Construction cost estimation is a critical aspect of construction activities that requires in-depth attention. The cost estimation process, which relies on specifications and working drawings prepared by the project owner, should ensure efficient and accurate project execution with appropriate and measurable execution methods. However, in reality, as revealed in previous research, there are still weaknesses in considering nonconformances in specifications in selecting heavy equipment, determining optimal execution methods, and ensuring efficient workforce management, including work safety aspects. Therefore, it is important to choose an implementation method that suits the characteristics of the field to ensure that the resulting cost analysis is accurate and appropriate. In some cases, the Unit Price Analysis Method (AHSP), in some cases, still tends to be general in nature and has not fully taken into account the differences between the 2016 and 2022 AHSP, such as changes in the coefficients for labor, equipment and materials. The effect of this discrepancy is that the base unit price often does not reflect the actual situation at the project site, which can impact the accuracy of cost estimates. To overcome this challenge, more in-depth adjustments are needed in the AHSP method to ensure that construction cost estimates truly reflect actual field conditions. This step will enable the use of the AHSP method as a more relevant and accurate tool for predicting construction project costs, which will ultimately support more efficient and effective project management. Thus, industrial construction can maximize resource efficiency and reduce potential cost discrepancies in the field.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

W. A. Widiyanto, “STUDI TENTANG PEDOMAN ANALISA HARGA SATUAN PEKERJA TAHUN 2013 DAN 2016 SERTA PENERAPANNYA DALAM DUNIA KONSTRUKSI,” J. Dimens. Pratama Tek. Sipil, vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 109–116, 2020.

N. Alami, U. A. Aziz, and D. Margiarti, “Studi komparasi perbandingan rencana anggaran biaya antara metode analisa harga satuan pekerjaan (AHSP) dan standar nasional indonesia (SNI),” Surya Bet. J. Ilmu Tek. Sipil, vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 10–19, 2021.

M. H. R. Chakim, M. Hatta, A. Himki, A. R. A. Zahra, and N. N. Azizah, “The Relationship Between Smart Cities and Smart Tourism: Using a Systematic Review,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1Sp, pp. 33–44, 2023.

H. C. Antonio, E. Edward, B. Proboyo, and I. Santoso, “STUDI TENTANG ANALISA BIAYA KONSTRUKSI SNI 2008 (BSN) DAN ANALISA HARGA SATUAN PEKERJAAN (AHSP) BIDANG PEKERJAAN UMUM 2013 (KPU),” J. Dimens. Pratama Tek. Sipil, vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 100–106, 2019.

K. P. Umum, “Peraturan Menteri Pekerjaan Umum dan Perumahan Rakyat Nomor 28,” PRT/M/2016 Tentang Pedoman Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Bidang Pekerjaan …, 2016.

F. P. Oganda, M. H. R. Chakim, W. E. Septian, and E. D. Astuti, “User Involvement on Air Quality in Incubation Rooms in Banten-Indonesia,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 86–92, 2023.

P. Permen, “No. 28 Tahun 2016 tentang Pedoman Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Bidang Pekerjaan Umum.(2016),” Menteri Pekerj. Umum dan Perumah. Rakyat Republik Indones..

A. Permadi, R. Waluyo, and W. Kristiana, “Analisis Estimasi Biaya Konstruksi Menggunakan Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan 2013 dan 2016,” J. Tek. J. Teor. dan Terap. Bid. Keteknikan, vol. 2, no. 1, pp. 1–12, 2018.

M. H. R. Chakim, M. A. D. Yuda, R. Fahrudin, and D. Apriliasari, “Secure and Transparent Elections: Exploring Decentralized Electronic Voting on P2P Blockchain,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1Sp, pp. 54–67, 2023.

P. M. P. Umum, “Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Bidang Cipta Karya,” Kementrian Pekerj. Umum, 2013.

I. Widiasanti and T. Mulyono, “PERAN JURUSAN TEKNIK SIPIL FT UNJ DALAM PENINGKATAN KEMAMPUAN ESTIMASI BIAYA KONSTRUKSI SEDERHANA BAGI LULUSAN SMK BANGUNAN DI WILAYAH JAKARTA TIMUR,” Bangunan, vol. 14, pp. 11–671.

V. P. APRILIAN, “PERENCANAAN METODE PELAKSANAAN, PENJADWALAN, DAN ESTIMASI BIAYA KONSTRUKSI URBAN ESCAPE WATERFRONT LIFESTYLE CENTER JAKARTA”.

A. Dwiretnani and I. A. Putra, “Kajian Kebutuhan Alat Berat pada Pekerjaan Tanah Pembangunan Turap atau Pematangan Lahan Parkir Kecamatan Pelayangan Seberang Kota Jambi,” J. Ilm. Univ. Batanghari Jambi, vol. 19, no. 2, pp. 391–395, 2019.

M. H. R. Chakim, A. Kho, N. P. L. Santoso, and H. Agustian, “Quality Factors of Intention To Use in Artificial Intelligence-Based AIKU Applications,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 72–85, 2023.

N. P. L. Santoso, R. A. Sunarjo, and I. S. Fadli, “Analyzing the Factors Influencing the Success of Business Incubation Programs: A SmartPLS Approach,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1, pp. 60–71, 2023.

K. A. Ratag, G. Y. Malingkas, and J. Tjakra, “Perbandingan Rencana Anggaran Biaya Antara Metode SNI Dengan Metode AHSP Pada Proyek Gedung Pendidikan Fakultas Teknik Jurusan Teknik Sipil Universitas Sam Ratulangi,” TEKNO, vol. 19, no. 79, 2021.

M. Hardini, R. A. Sunarjo, M. Asfi, M. H. R. Chakim, and Y. P. A. Sanjaya, “Predicting Air Quality Index using Ensemble Machine Learning,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1Sp, pp. 78–86, 2023.

V. Y. Enderzon, “Identifikasi risiko proyek konstruksi flyover dan underpass di indonesia (kajian literatur),” Rekayasa Sipil, vol. 14, no. 2, pp. 104–111, 2020.

B. Prasetyo, “Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Galian Pada Proyek Pembangunan Jalan Lingkar ITERA,” J. Ilmu Tek., vol. 2, no. 3, 2022.

T. Raharjo, “A Model of Critical Success Factors for Agile Information Technology Project in Indonesia using Analytic Hierarchy Process (AHP),” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1Sp, pp. 68–77, 2023.

S. F. Yanuar, N. S. Rizal, and T. Abadi, “Analisis Perbandingan Harga Satuan Galian Tanah Mekanis Menggunakan Permen-PUPR Tahun 2022 Dan 2016,” J. Rekayasa Infrastruktur Hexag., vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 25–32, 2022.

G. Pribadi, “BUKU AJAR: ALAT BERAT DAN PTM,” 2022.

S. S. Laurentia, A. B. Siswanto, T. Mindiastiwi, and A. P. Santoso, “ANALISIS PERHITUNGAN WAKTU DAN BIAYA PEKERJAAN GALIAN TANAH (STUDI KASUS PROYEK NORMALISASI SUNGAI JUWANA),” J. Civ. Eng. Technol. Sci., vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 17–23, 2022.

C. Lukita, M. H. R. Chakim, R. Supriati, N. P. L. Santoso, and M. F. Kamil, “Exploration of Perceived Use of Technology Using A Digital Business Perspective,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1Sp, pp. 87–96, 2023.

M. Fajar, “Analisis Perbandingan Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Metode AHSP dan Metode Aktual (Studi Kasus: Pekerjaan Beton Pembangunan Gedung Rumah Sakit Umum Type-C di Kec. Medan Labuhan).” Universitas Sumatera Utara, 2019.

F. Adibroto, D. Hamid, M. Muluk, and R. Dinna, “Analisa Harga Satuan Pekerjaan Beton Bertulang Berdasarkan Analisa Pada Proyek Dan Analisa Harga Satuan Pekerjaan (AHSP) SNI 2016 Pada Proyek Pembangunan Aeon Mixed Use Project Phase II-Apartemen 3 Sentul City Bogor,” J. Ilm. Rekayasa Sipil, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 92–102, 2019.

F. Zulkarnain, “[HAKI] Pemindahan Tanah Mekanis Dan Peralatan Konstruksi,” Kumpul. BERKAS KEPANGKATAN DOSEN, 2022.

S. F. Rostiyanti, “Alat berat untuk proyek konstruksi,” 2002.

S. Pranata, K. Hadi, M. H. R. Chakim, Y. Shino, and I. N. Hikam, “Business Relationship in Business Process Management and Management with the Literature Review Method,” ADI J. Recent Innov., vol. 5, no. 1Sp, pp. 45–53, 2023.

R. M. Sokop, T. T. Arsjad, and G. Malingkas, “Analisa Perhitungan Produktivitas Alat Berat Gali-Muat (Excavator) Dan Alat Angkut (Dump Truck) Pada Pekerjaan Pematangan Lahan Perumahan Residence Jordan Sea,” Tekno, vol. 16, no. 70, 2018.

K. P. Umum, “Analisis Harga Satuan Pekerjaan (AHSP) Bidang Pekerjaan Umum,” Jakarta Balitbang PU, 2012.